A foreign judgment is only as good as your ability to collect on it. When a debtor has hidden or moved assets, the records that reveal where the money went are often held by U.S. banks, payment processors, and financial institutions. Section 1782 is the tool that reaches them.
Why the United States is where the money trail runs
The U.S. dollar dominates international finance, and a large share of cross-border payments clear through U.S. banks. That means the documentary record of a transfer — who sent what, to whom, and when — frequently exists with a U.S.-based institution, even when neither the debtor nor the creditor is American. Section 1782 lets a foreign judgment creditor ask a U.S. court to compel those records.
What § 1782 can help you obtain
- Bank and account records showing balances, ownership, and signatories;
- Wire-transfer and payment records that trace where funds were sent and received;
- Know-your-customer and account-opening files that can reveal related entities and beneficial owners;
- Records from corporate service providers, registered agents, and counterparties connected to the debtor;
- Deposition testimony from a U.S.-based witness with knowledge of the assets.
How enforcement fits § 1782's requirements
Section 1782 requires a qualifying foreign proceeding. Post-judgment enforcement and execution proceedings in a foreign court are themselves proceedings before a foreign tribunal, and a judgment creditor pursuing them is a classic "interested person." Courts have recognized § 1782's use to support the enforcement and collection phase — not just the merits phase — of foreign litigation.
Two of the discretionary Intel factors tend to favor these applications:
- The target is usually a non-party. Banks and financial institutions holding the records are typically not parties to your foreign case, so the foreign court can't easily reach them — which weighs in favor of § 1782.
- Targeted requests. Asset-tracing requests can be framed narrowly around specific accounts, entities, and date ranges, helping you avoid the "unduly burdensome" objection.
A typical asset-tracing sequence
- Map what you know. Identify the debtor's known U.S. touchpoints — banks, transfers, entities, addresses.
- Pick the district and target. File where the institution is "found."
- File the application with a petition, a declaration explaining the foreign judgment and enforcement effort, a proposed order, and a tightly drawn subpoena.
- Obtain records, then follow the trail. Production often reveals new transfers and entities — which can support further targeted requests.
- Use what you find to attach, freeze, or execute against assets in the appropriate forum.
Chasing a debtor who moved money through the U.S.?
Tell us about your judgment and where you think the assets went. We'll assess whether § 1782 can open the trail.
Request a consultation Ask the AI assistantRelated reading: The Complete Guide to § 1782 · Who can apply for § 1782 discovery? · § 1782 and international arbitration
This article provides general information about 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Availability of § 1782 for asset tracing or judgment enforcement is fact-specific and varies by federal district and by the law of the foreign proceeding. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. For advice, request a consultation.