U.S. evidence for foreign cases · Get My Discovery — a d/b/a of the Law Office of Derek J. Soltis
§ 1782 · Singapore

U.S. evidence for your Singapore litigation

Singapore is one of the world's busiest cross-border dispute hubs. When a case before the Singapore courts turns on documents, banking records, or testimony located in the United States, 28 U.S.C. § 1782 is often the fastest way to reach them.

For parties before the Singapore courts, obtaining evidence from a third party located in the United States is difficult through the Singapore forum alone. Section 1782 lets a party in Singapore proceedings ask a U.S. federal court to compel that evidence for use back home.

Why Singapore litigants use § 1782

Common Singapore scenarios

Commercial disputes before the Singapore High Court or the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) needing documents from a U.S. company; cross-border fraud and asset tracing where money was routed through New York; technology and IP matters needing evidence held by U.S. platforms; and enforcement of a Singapore judgment against assets in the United States.

Does it qualify? After ZF Automotive (2022), § 1782 covers foreign court and government/regulatory proceedings — litigation before the Singapore High Court and the SICC squarely qualifies. It generally does not cover private commercial arbitration (e.g., SIAC), though a related court action may. See the arbitration note.

How it works

We act as your U.S. counsel: we confirm fit, identify the right U.S. federal district (where the evidence-holder is found), prepare and file the application — usually ex parte — and see it through to production. You and your Singapore lawyers keep the matter; we handle the U.S. side. For firms, see For Foreign Counsel.

Have a Singapore case that needs U.S. evidence?

Tell us about the proceeding and what you're trying to obtain. We'll give you a candid read on whether § 1782 fits.

Request a consultation Read the full guide

Related: The Complete Guide to § 1782 · How an application is filed · § 1782 vs. letters rogatory

This page is attorney advertising and provides general information about 28 U.S.C. § 1782; it is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Availability is fact-specific and varies by U.S. federal district. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Get My Discovery is a d/b/a of the Law Office of Derek J. Soltis, admitted in New York (Reg. #5175971).